<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google One Box Results: The Real Threat to Publishers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://explicitly.me/google-one-box-results-the-real-threat-to-publishers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://explicitly.me/google-one-box-results-the-real-threat-to-publishers</link>
	<description>Rishil&#039;s Home on the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:43:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Search Neutrality Debate &#124; The Great Websites Blog</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/google-one-box-results-the-real-threat-to-publishers/comment-page-1#comment-2488</link>
		<dc:creator>The Search Neutrality Debate &#124; The Great Websites Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=936#comment-2488</guid>
		<description>[...] is only part of the picture. There are other aspects of the search result pages &#8211; such as the OneBox &#8211; where Google is blatantly promoting its own services, which might require proper [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is only part of the picture. There are other aspects of the search result pages &#8211; such as the OneBox &#8211; where Google is blatantly promoting its own services, which might require proper [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark mitchell</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/google-one-box-results-the-real-threat-to-publishers/comment-page-1#comment-2399</link>
		<dc:creator>mark mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 16:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=936#comment-2399</guid>
		<description>good article Rishi - i feel Google will continue to do more things like this as it&#039;s important for them to capture consumer data as well provide the user a different / but relevant experience. If I was working at a comparison site now i would be very worried about their future. Be interesting to see how the landscape changes when Google starts to generate a new GroupON style service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good article Rishi &#8211; i feel Google will continue to do more things like this as it&#8217;s important for them to capture consumer data as well provide the user a different / but relevant experience. If I was working at a comparison site now i would be very worried about their future. Be interesting to see how the landscape changes when Google starts to generate a new GroupON style service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jey Pandian</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/google-one-box-results-the-real-threat-to-publishers/comment-page-1#comment-2397</link>
		<dc:creator>Jey Pandian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=936#comment-2397</guid>
		<description>Nice set of queries Rishi - eye opening - imho in reading your article - my takeaway: Google is essentially raising the barrier for excellence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice set of queries Rishi &#8211; eye opening &#8211; imho in reading your article &#8211; my takeaway: Google is essentially raising the barrier for excellence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: secret salons</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/google-one-box-results-the-real-threat-to-publishers/comment-page-1#comment-2388</link>
		<dc:creator>secret salons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 17:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=936#comment-2388</guid>
		<description>Yes, totally agree. Google is also very good at getting 3rd party data and stealing their traffic. see what they have done with Yelp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, totally agree. Google is also very good at getting 3rd party data and stealing their traffic. see what they have done with Yelp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Millard</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/google-one-box-results-the-real-threat-to-publishers/comment-page-1#comment-2383</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Millard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=936#comment-2383</guid>
		<description>Totally agree that Onebox is rough on publishers.  Some of the worst I have seen are for sports teams.  If you search for a premier league team not only do you get last game/next game, but if you search during a match you get a live score.  That leaves the searcher with little incentive to click a result if they&#039;re checking the latest score.

I&#039;ve noticed the same with &quot;england cricket&quot; and presume it&#039;s the same for NFL/NBA/NHL etc on .com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree that Onebox is rough on publishers.  Some of the worst I have seen are for sports teams.  If you search for a premier league team not only do you get last game/next game, but if you search during a match you get a live score.  That leaves the searcher with little incentive to click a result if they&#8217;re checking the latest score.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed the same with &#8220;england cricket&#8221; and presume it&#8217;s the same for NFL/NBA/NHL etc on .com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam - Zaddle Internet Marketing</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/google-one-box-results-the-real-threat-to-publishers/comment-page-1#comment-2382</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam - Zaddle Internet Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=936#comment-2382</guid>
		<description>Oh! and I forgot to finish off by answering your question - is it a real threat to publishers - absolutely. If you look at the Google shopping results, there is now a &quot;compare prices&quot; listing that gives you anything from 3-10 results showing the price of the item. Not great if you are a price comparison site :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh! and I forgot to finish off by answering your question &#8211; is it a real threat to publishers &#8211; absolutely. If you look at the Google shopping results, there is now a &#8220;compare prices&#8221; listing that gives you anything from 3-10 results showing the price of the item. Not great if you are a price comparison site <img src='http://explicitly.me/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam - Zaddle Internet Marketing</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/google-one-box-results-the-real-threat-to-publishers/comment-page-1#comment-2381</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam - Zaddle Internet Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=936#comment-2381</guid>
		<description>Rishil - great post - you don&#039;t realise just how much influence the Google One Box actually has - I have used probably 50% of those you have listed above without giving it a second thought.

However (at the moment) I am a big Google fan - I do think they put the user first most of the time and are continually changing how the results are shown to determine what people are wanting to see (sometimes good, sometimes bad).

I have seen with the advent of click to call within AdWords that Google could lose out on a huge amount of normal AdWords traffic (and spend) - especially when you are comparing the conversion rates between click to call for some industries and a standard Google AdWords campaign - we run a campaign at the moment whereby the difference in conversions is negligible, yet the cost is literally thousands cheaper with the Click to Call - it is highly likely we will either stop the normal AdWords campaign or expand it into remarketing etc. Again I think Google have done this to because it enhances the user experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rishil &#8211; great post &#8211; you don&#8217;t realise just how much influence the Google One Box actually has &#8211; I have used probably 50% of those you have listed above without giving it a second thought.</p>
<p>However (at the moment) I am a big Google fan &#8211; I do think they put the user first most of the time and are continually changing how the results are shown to determine what people are wanting to see (sometimes good, sometimes bad).</p>
<p>I have seen with the advent of click to call within AdWords that Google could lose out on a huge amount of normal AdWords traffic (and spend) &#8211; especially when you are comparing the conversion rates between click to call for some industries and a standard Google AdWords campaign &#8211; we run a campaign at the moment whereby the difference in conversions is negligible, yet the cost is literally thousands cheaper with the Click to Call &#8211; it is highly likely we will either stop the normal AdWords campaign or expand it into remarketing etc. Again I think Google have done this to because it enhances the user experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
