<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google SSL &#8211; Secure Search – Referrer Data Stripped</title>
	<atom:link href="http://explicitly.me/google-ssl-secure-search-referrer-data-stripped/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://explicitly.me/google-ssl-secure-search-referrer-data-stripped</link>
	<description>Rishil&#039;s Home on the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:43:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Everfluxx</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/google-ssl-secure-search-referrer-data-stripped/comment-page-1#comment-10784</link>
		<dc:creator>Everfluxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=838#comment-10784</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I predicted the KW data being stripped going main stream.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Uhm, no. Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but this article was about the &quot;natural&quot; consequences of using SSL (i.e., no Referer &lt;em&gt;at all&lt;/em&gt; from HTTPS to HTTP, as per &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec15.html#sec15.1.3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;RFC 2616&lt;/a&gt;), not about Google deliberately choosing to &lt;em&gt;remove the query&lt;/em&gt; from the Referer sooner or later. Amirite?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I predicted the KW data being stripped going main stream.</p></blockquote>
<p>Uhm, no. Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but this article was about the &#8220;natural&#8221; consequences of using SSL (i.e., no Referer <em>at all</em> from HTTPS to HTTP, as per <a href="http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec15.html#sec15.1.3" rel="nofollow">RFC 2616</a>), not about Google deliberately choosing to <em>remove the query</em> from the Referer sooner or later. Amirite?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rishil</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/google-ssl-secure-search-referrer-data-stripped/comment-page-1#comment-10723</link>
		<dc:creator>rishil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=838#comment-10723</guid>
		<description>Yeah - it used to, but like you say, not anymore. . This article is about an year old, when I predicted the KW data being stripped going main stream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah &#8211; it used to, but like you say, not anymore. . This article is about an year old, when I predicted the KW data being stripped going main stream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everfluxx</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/google-ssl-secure-search-referrer-data-stripped/comment-page-1#comment-10538</link>
		<dc:creator>Everfluxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=838#comment-10538</guid>
		<description>Hi Rishi, &quot;using HTTPS to capture referral data&quot; won&#039;t work with https://www.google.com/, because Google &lt;strong&gt;strips&lt;/strong&gt; the query from the Referer (this is different from what happens on encrypted.google.com). Check out my test results: http://www.everfluxx.com/google-ssl-referer-test-results/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rishi, &#8220;using HTTPS to capture referral data&#8221; won&#8217;t work with <a href="https://www.google.com/" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/</a>, because Google <strong>strips</strong> the query from the Referer (this is different from what happens on encrypted.google.com). Check out my test results: <a href="http://www.everfluxx.com/google-ssl-referer-test-results/" rel="nofollow">http://www.everfluxx.com/google-ssl-referer-test-results/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/google-ssl-secure-search-referrer-data-stripped/comment-page-1#comment-1048</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 23:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=838#comment-1048</guid>
		<description>Hi Rishi,

You&#039;re completely right - Google&#039;s new SSL page will only cause headaches for PPC and SEO professionals and anyone who&#039;s interested in optimising their website.

I guess the SSL page is Google&#039;s response to online privacy&#039;s growing fashionability, but perhaps we need to realise that privacy is over-rated, and that handing over our browsing data can have positive benefits for everyone.

In a blog post I wrote on Google&#039;s SSL page, I suggest how the removal of referral data can lead to higher prices of goods and services for everyone: 

http://www.calculatemarketing.com/blog/discussion/google-ssl-page-how-privacy-leads-to-higher-prices/ 

Would love to hear your thoughts.

Cheers,
Alan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rishi,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re completely right &#8211; Google&#8217;s new SSL page will only cause headaches for PPC and SEO professionals and anyone who&#8217;s interested in optimising their website.</p>
<p>I guess the SSL page is Google&#8217;s response to online privacy&#8217;s growing fashionability, but perhaps we need to realise that privacy is over-rated, and that handing over our browsing data can have positive benefits for everyone.</p>
<p>In a blog post I wrote on Google&#8217;s SSL page, I suggest how the removal of referral data can lead to higher prices of goods and services for everyone: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.calculatemarketing.com/blog/discussion/google-ssl-page-how-privacy-leads-to-higher-prices/" rel="nofollow">http://www.calculatemarketing.com/blog/discussion/google-ssl-page-how-privacy-leads-to-higher-prices/</a> </p>
<p>Would love to hear your thoughts.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Alan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ewyu</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/google-ssl-secure-search-referrer-data-stripped/comment-page-1#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>ewyu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 07:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=838#comment-999</guid>
		<description>If they do roll it out on a larger scale, I wonder how this will impact sites that are using the &quot;First Click Free&quot; program. On Google&#039;s official blog post, they explicitly cite that you check the incoming http referrer: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/10/first-click-free-for-web-search.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they do roll it out on a larger scale, I wonder how this will impact sites that are using the &#8220;First Click Free&#8221; program. On Google&#8217;s official blog post, they explicitly cite that you check the incoming http referrer: <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/10/first-click-free-for-web-search.html" rel="nofollow">http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/10/first-click-free-for-web-search.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tad Chef</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/google-ssl-secure-search-referrer-data-stripped/comment-page-1#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>Tad Chef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=838#comment-996</guid>
		<description>There is even a lawsuit out there that might force Google to use the SSL version or otherwise strip referer data altogether for privacy reasons:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/10/26/google_privacy_flap/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is even a lawsuit out there that might force Google to use the SSL version or otherwise strip referer data altogether for privacy reasons:<br />
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/10/26/google_privacy_flap/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/10/26/google_privacy_flap/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
