<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Learning from the Chrome Penalty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://explicitly.me/learning-from-the-chrome-penalty/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://explicitly.me/learning-from-the-chrome-penalty</link>
	<description>Rishil&#039;s Home on the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:43:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/learning-from-the-chrome-penalty/comment-page-1#comment-23352</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 21:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=1446#comment-23352</guid>
		<description>Adding on to my previous post. We worked on a .co.uk and redirect the .com domain to the .co.uk. It appears that the penalty has finally caught up with us as we got a notifcation regarding unnatural linking, despite doing nothing of the sort on the .co.uk domain. 

Hopefully I can simply get rid of the 301 redirect and my rankings will stay safe.

Thanks,
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adding on to my previous post. We worked on a .co.uk and redirect the .com domain to the .co.uk. It appears that the penalty has finally caught up with us as we got a notifcation regarding unnatural linking, despite doing nothing of the sort on the .co.uk domain. </p>
<p>Hopefully I can simply get rid of the 301 redirect and my rankings will stay safe.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emory Rowland</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/learning-from-the-chrome-penalty/comment-page-1#comment-19267</link>
		<dc:creator>Emory Rowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=1446#comment-19267</guid>
		<description>Funny to imagine, but has anyone suggested a site wide penalty should have been invoked. Seriously, if this were John Doe&#039;s awesome browser instead of Chrome, I wonder if there would have been just a subdirectory level penalty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny to imagine, but has anyone suggested a site wide penalty should have been invoked. Seriously, if this were John Doe&#8217;s awesome browser instead of Chrome, I wonder if there would have been just a subdirectory level penalty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dixon Jones</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/learning-from-the-chrome-penalty/comment-page-1#comment-18392</link>
		<dc:creator>Dixon Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 15:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=1446#comment-18392</guid>
		<description>Ian - We&#039;ve thought about it ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian &#8211; We&#8217;ve thought about it <img src='http://explicitly.me/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ingo Bousa</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/learning-from-the-chrome-penalty/comment-page-1#comment-18189</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingo Bousa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=1446#comment-18189</guid>
		<description>Google acts exactly like a Government would. It&#039;s like playing chess. Very slick..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google acts exactly like a Government would. It&#8217;s like playing chess. Very slick..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/learning-from-the-chrome-penalty/comment-page-1#comment-18124</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=1446#comment-18124</guid>
		<description>I recently received a penalty for just ONE of my pages on my site. It dropped from top 5 to around 70-80 and was the only page on my site to do so.

I&#039;m really unsure as to what my plan of action should be. 

Is this a manual penalty that needs manually reversing? Or will removing any dodgy links reverse the rankings automatically?

Thanks,
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently received a penalty for just ONE of my pages on my site. It dropped from top 5 to around 70-80 and was the only page on my site to do so.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really unsure as to what my plan of action should be. </p>
<p>Is this a manual penalty that needs manually reversing? Or will removing any dodgy links reverse the rankings automatically?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcos</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/learning-from-the-chrome-penalty/comment-page-1#comment-17753</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 10:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=1446#comment-17753</guid>
		<description>Hi Rishil,

Thanks for mentioning my comment in Matt Cutts Plus page

&quot;Now lets take another coment – made by someone on Matt Cutts post:&quot;

Great article released today on Google´s transparency and their double standards 
http://www.seobook.com/transparency</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rishil,</p>
<p>Thanks for mentioning my comment in Matt Cutts Plus page</p>
<p>&#8220;Now lets take another coment – made by someone on Matt Cutts post:&#8221;</p>
<p>Great article released today on Google´s transparency and their double standards<br />
<a href="http://www.seobook.com/transparency" rel="nofollow">http://www.seobook.com/transparency</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Campbell</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/learning-from-the-chrome-penalty/comment-page-1#comment-17548</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=1446#comment-17548</guid>
		<description>Great PR stunt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great PR stunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Sheldon</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/learning-from-the-chrome-penalty/comment-page-1#comment-17375</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Sheldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 03:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=1446#comment-17375</guid>
		<description>Interesting, Rishi-

I think your point is well taken, that any other site would have seen the entire site penalized, rather than the page.

Interesting, but dismaying that they even saw it as necessary. I&#039;m afraid the repercussions may be unpleasant for a lot of folks. You might find this video that Andy Beard put up today interesting on that front. http://andybeard.eu/3606/reinstate-chrome.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, Rishi-</p>
<p>I think your point is well taken, that any other site would have seen the entire site penalized, rather than the page.</p>
<p>Interesting, but dismaying that they even saw it as necessary. I&#8217;m afraid the repercussions may be unpleasant for a lot of folks. You might find this video that Andy Beard put up today interesting on that front. <a href="http://andybeard.eu/3606/reinstate-chrome.html" rel="nofollow">http://andybeard.eu/3606/reinstate-chrome.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: searchengineman</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/learning-from-the-chrome-penalty/comment-page-1#comment-17327</link>
		<dc:creator>searchengineman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=1446#comment-17327</guid>
		<description>Wow - what a take away - directory based penalties..it&#039;s nice to know that Google
won&#039;t completely nuke an entire site, for alleged infractions.  Is there anyone else who agrees that the drop is directory based only?

Searchengineman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; what a take away &#8211; directory based penalties..it&#8217;s nice to know that Google<br />
won&#8217;t completely nuke an entire site, for alleged infractions.  Is there anyone else who agrees that the drop is directory based only?</p>
<p>Searchengineman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Lurie</title>
		<link>http://explicitly.me/learning-from-the-chrome-penalty/comment-page-1#comment-17302</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Lurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://explicitly.me/?p=1446#comment-17302</guid>
		<description>The painful truth here: Google is only human after all. Which means they shouldn&#039;t wield god-like power over the internet.

Anyone want to build a search engine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The painful truth here: Google is only human after all. Which means they shouldn&#8217;t wield god-like power over the internet.</p>
<p>Anyone want to build a search engine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
