Comments on: Social Content – Sharing and Responsibility http://explicitly.me/social-media-content-copyrights Rishil's Home on the Web Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:43:52 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: rishil http://explicitly.me/social-media-content-copyrights/comment-page-1#comment-439 rishil Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:19:03 +0000 http://explicitly.me/?p=133#comment-439 thats like saying everything at facebook.com is the property of facebook. thats like saying everything at facebook.com is the property of facebook.

]]> By: Directory Sieve http://explicitly.me/social-media-content-copyrights/comment-page-1#comment-438 Directory Sieve Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:51:23 +0000 http://explicitly.me/?p=133#comment-438 i though all contents available at twitter is a property of twitter.com, i mean should'nt all comments here should be a property of explicitly.me? using someone's image for ads and promotions is bad but i think we should allow images to be used under the fair use clause, given that the source is attributed properly. i though all contents available at twitter is a property of twitter.com, i mean should’nt all comments here should be a property of explicitly.me?

using someone’s image for ads and promotions is bad but i think we should allow images to be used under the fair use clause, given that the source is attributed properly.

]]> By: Link Building for Image Rich Websites | Wiep.net http://explicitly.me/social-media-content-copyrights/comment-page-1#comment-437 Link Building for Image Rich Websites | Wiep.net Fri, 09 Apr 2010 11:30:06 +0000 http://explicitly.me/?p=133#comment-437 [...] Two great additional resources from the comments. Who said blog commenting can’t get you links? :) Push my Buttons! [...] [...] Two great additional resources from the comments. Who said blog commenting can’t get you links? :) Push my Buttons! [...]

]]> By: Luke Jones http://explicitly.me/social-media-content-copyrights/comment-page-1#comment-331 Luke Jones Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:49:29 +0000 http://explicitly.me/?p=133#comment-331 You make an interesting point about Twitter and I agree with you. We are the people who provide Twitter with content and <em>usually</em> the creator of the content holds whichever licence they decide/determine. In this case I'm not sure what it is because I haven't read Twitter's terms and conditions to see if it states who owns the licence... You make an interesting point about Twitter and I agree with you. We are the people who provide Twitter with content and usually the creator of the content holds whichever licence they decide/determine.

In this case I’m not sure what it is because I haven’t read Twitter’s terms and conditions to see if it states who owns the licence…

]]>